One other omission in Codex Sinaiticus with theological implications is the reference to Jesus’ ascension in Luke 24:51.
ORIGINAL TEXT OF NEW TESTAMENT PLUS
Modern scholarship generally holds that Mark is in fact the oldest of the Synoptic Gospels, which could cause theological concerns over the omitted resurrection.īecome a Member of Biblical Archaeology Society Now and Get More Than Half Off the Regular Price of the All-Access Pass! Explore the world’s most intriguing Biblical scholarshipĭig into more than 9,000 articles in the Biblical Archaeology Society’s vast library plus much more with an All-Access pass. If this were true, the absence of resurrection in Mark would not be a problem because it appears in the older Matthean gospel. According to James Bentley, Tischendorf was not troubled by the omission of the resurrection in Mark because he believed that Matthew was written first and that Mark’s gospel was an abridged version of Matthew’s gospel. The woman caught in adultery from John 8 is omitted in Codex Sinaiticus.
So is the conclusion of the Lord’s Prayer: “For thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever. For example, the resurrection narrative at the end of Mark (16:9–20) is absent from the Codex Sinaiticus. The text of Codex Sinaiticus differs in numerous instances from that of the authorized version of the Bible in use during Tischendorf’s time. Porter contends that Tischendorf should be considered a hero, not a thief. In his article “Hero or Thief? Constantine Tischendorf Turns Two Hundred” in the September/October 2015 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review, Stanley E. Dating to the mid-fourth century C.E., Codex Sinaiticus is the oldest complete manuscript of the New Testament. Two hundred years after Constantine Tischendorf’s birth, questions remain as to the conditions of his removal of Codex Sinaiticus from St. A salvaged page of the Codex Sinaiticus from St.
0 kommentar(er)
